#26  
Old 07-16-2012, 11:10 AM
rlitman rlitman is online now
WeldingWeb Artisan
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,838
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Vertically, yes indeed. I'm probably the only one crazy enough to have done this.
It's strapped to a hand truck, with a steel hoop holding the argon bottle next to it, and the torch lead winds up around a pair of hooks on the back.
Because of the way it is strapped into a cradle welded to the back of the hand truck, the back of the machine (which is on the bottom), hangs almost a foot above the floor. It kind of looks like a side by side oxy/acetylene cart setup.
I save a LOT of floor space that way (vs a traditional cart design), and it's still easy to move around.
It is also nice having the display and knob facing up, but you do have to reach under the machine to get to the switch.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-16-2012, 06:50 PM
SundownIII SundownIII is offline
WeldingWeb Artisan
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deltaville, VA
Posts: 2,899
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Seems to me if Miller had wanted the Dynasty 200 mounted vertically, they would have put feet on the back of the machine.

The front of the machine has louvers to prevent anything liquid or even solid from simply dropping into the machine. When you mount it vertically, you've basically defeated the louvers. Much more susceptable to dust also.

Also disagree about the pulser on the Syncrowave. One of the main reasons I upgraded from my previous Sync 250 to the current machine was because of the ability to field install the internal pulser. My Sync 250 did not come with the pulser (optional), but it was the first thing I added.

Slow speed pulsing is what pulsing was originally all about. With slow speed pulsing you have (and can see) the high amp (melting)cycle and the low amp (freezing) cycle. Works extremely well with thin wall SS tube. Actually, you can even determine the lower "average" heat put into the weldment vs what happens with high speed pulsing. High speed pulsing (>120 PPS) does "agitate" the puddle more, but has a different effect on the average heat input than does the slow speed pulsing.

Slow speed pulsing (Syncrowaves) definitely has it's place, especially on thin SS and mild steel. If it didn't have a place, I suspect you wouldn't have that same capability on the Dynasty series.
__________________
Syncro 250 DX
Dynasty 200 DX
MM 251 w/30A SG
XMT 304 w/714 Feeder & Optima Pulser
HH187
Dialarc 250 AC/DC
Hypertherm PM 1250
Smith, Harris, Victor O/A
Smith and Thermco Gas Mixers
Access to a full fab shop with CNC Plasma, Water Jet, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-16-2012, 07:55 PM
shovelon's Avatar
shovelon shovelon is offline
WeldingWeb Artisan
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal-LA
Posts: 2,985
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Quote:
Originally Posted by SundownIII View Post

Also disagree about the pulser on the Syncrowave. One of the main reasons I upgraded from my previous Sync 250 to the current machine was because of the ability to field install the internal pulser. My Sync 250 did not come with the pulser (optional), but it was the first thing I added.

Slow speed pulsing is what pulsing was originally all about. With slow speed pulsing you have (and can see) the high amp (melting)cycle and the low amp (freezing) cycle. Works extremely well with thin wall SS tube. Actually, you can even determine the lower "average" heat put into the weldment vs what happens with high speed pulsing. High speed pulsing (>120 PPS) does "agitate" the puddle more, but has a different effect on the average heat input than does the slow speed pulsing.

Slow speed pulsing (Syncrowaves) definitely has it's place, especially on thin SS and mild steel. If it didn't have a place, I suspect you wouldn't have that same capability on the Dynasty series.
Well more power to ya if you can find a use for 10pps. I really don't want to see anything but productivity, and slow speed pulsing only slows me down. In fact I could only take a few minutes of it before I wanted to shoot myself because the frequency gave me eye fatigue on an industrial strength level.

Anything under 5pps I have a foot control for.
__________________
"Nothing welded, nothing gained."
Miller Dynasty700DX, 3 ea. Dynasty350DX, Dynasty200DX, ThermalArc 400 GTSW, MillerMatic350P, MillerMatic200 with spoolgun, MKCobraMig260, Lincoln SP-170T,PlasmaCam/Hypertherm 1250, Hypertherm800
GaryJohnson2016
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-17-2012, 12:44 PM
SundownIII SundownIII is offline
WeldingWeb Artisan
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deltaville, VA
Posts: 2,899
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Shovelon,

Different scenario, different goals.

You're looking for "maximium production", I'm looking for "optimal results".

I (and I suspect many of our other tiggers) are looking for a way to get the best results in a given situation. We're not in a race to see who can get things done. Heck, if speed was foremost, I'd probably just weld it up with pulsed mig.
__________________
Syncro 250 DX
Dynasty 200 DX
MM 251 w/30A SG
XMT 304 w/714 Feeder & Optima Pulser
HH187
Dialarc 250 AC/DC
Hypertherm PM 1250
Smith, Harris, Victor O/A
Smith and Thermco Gas Mixers
Access to a full fab shop with CNC Plasma, Water Jet, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-17-2012, 12:59 PM
shovelon's Avatar
shovelon shovelon is offline
WeldingWeb Artisan
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal-LA
Posts: 2,985
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Quote:
Originally Posted by SundownIII View Post
Shovelon,
Heck, if speed was foremost, I'd probably just weld it up with pulsed mig.
Touche
__________________
"Nothing welded, nothing gained."
Miller Dynasty700DX, 3 ea. Dynasty350DX, Dynasty200DX, ThermalArc 400 GTSW, MillerMatic350P, MillerMatic200 with spoolgun, MKCobraMig260, Lincoln SP-170T,PlasmaCam/Hypertherm 1250, Hypertherm800
GaryJohnson2016
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-17-2012, 01:13 PM
killdozerd11's Avatar
killdozerd11 killdozerd11 is offline
WeldingWeb Craftsman
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Peoples Republic of California
Posts: 1,235
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

One thing about the Dynasty it does make quite a buzzing sound that the other old tig machines that i have run never did

Probably not pulse but the frequency it was being run at
__________________
Backed my CATMA over your CARMA oops clusmy me

What would SATAN do ??

Miller Digital Elite
Miller Trail Blazer 302 Air Pak
Suitecase 12RC
Spectrum 625 Xtreme
Victor O/A
Evolution Rage 3 saw
Rusty old Truck
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-17-2012, 04:36 PM
aevald aevald is offline
WeldingWeb Foreman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SW Washington State
Posts: 910
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Hello all, I have watched this thread with interest. There have been many offshoots associated with the original topic and I feel that all of them have pointed out various needs/reasons for whichever choice or selection that an individual might choose to make.

On the one hand you have the reasoning of power consumption issues, Dynasty likely comes out on top in that area, yet with the associated price that might have a lot to do with justification for that choice or not.

Price and general availability would likely favor a Syncrowave choice, yet, depending upon the sort of deal that an individual stumbles upon, not always, you might still come upon a once-in-a-lifetime deal that puts the Dynasty in your hands.

Then you have tradition, no matter what the benefits or other influences there may well be, there are those who are molded into the comfort/capabilities of a Syncrowave and there is no other choice.

You are going to have a myriad of different perceived needs and applications of GTAW/TIG welding that everyone is trying to address with their particular machine choice. Thus, there will be pro's and con's for each individual that will drive and support their choice.

A crystal ball would be really nice to have when we start planning on outfitting our shops with all of the machinery needs that we perceive to be on our horizon. Only then could we possibly go about doing so without making a mistake or two and be completely efficient at that task. Short of that, we all go through different rituals and lines of reasoning to accomplish the task.

I do wish to say thank you to everyone who posts on this forum, as the views and trains of thought, lines of reasoning and justification all make for some informative and interesting reading. Thanks folks and best regards, Allan
__________________
aevald
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-17-2012, 05:48 PM
AndyA AndyA is offline
WeldingWeb Foreman
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas Near Dallas
Posts: 974
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Quote:
Originally Posted by killdozerd11 View Post
One thing about the Dynasty it does make quite a buzzing sound that the other old tig machines that i have run never did

Probably not pulse but the frequency it was being run at
Yeah that disturbed me a little when I first ran the machine. I definitely does have more "bells and whistles" in both meanings.
__________________

MM210, For sale $1k with cart,reg,gun,hose, and 250cf bottle
Dynasty200DX w/coolmate1
MM Vintage
Lincoln AC225
Victor O/A, Smith AW1A
Cutmaster 81
IR 2475N7.5FP
Rage3
Jancy USA101
9" SB
9" Craftsman/Atlas lathe (worn out)
AEAD-200LE
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-17-2012, 08:37 PM
OldSkull's Avatar
OldSkull OldSkull is offline
WeldingWeb Tradesman
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Québec Canada
Posts: 233
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

From a Hobbyist NOOB tigger point of view...Neither of those are a good choice if you get them new, they are to expensive to just have fun with A Diversion or a used Synchowave are more budget wise... As far I'm concern any TIG capable of welding 1/4 Aluminum or steel can fill all my needs as long it's Blue
__________________
Miller MM211
Duck tape
Ty- rap
Kool-aid
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-24-2012, 05:59 PM
con_fuse9 con_fuse9 is offline
WeldingWeb Foreman
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 564
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelon View Post
Don't forget to adjust the gaps at tungsten points when cover is off to blow out Sync. Excessive gaps can cause hard starting and HF interference in television and radio reception. Points should be replaced when excessivly worn and should not be dressed.

No such events with Dynasty.
Some of us with older Dynastys it still an issue. Mine has points under the cover.
__________________
Con Fuse!
Miller Dynasty 350
Millermatic 350P
-Spoolmatic 30A

Miller Multimatic 200
Hypertherm PowerMax 1000G3
Miller Maxstar 200DX
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-01-2012, 10:03 PM
bentwings bentwings is offline
WeldingWeb Journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 85
Re: Dynasty vs. Syncrowave

We have a new Sy 250 DX with all the options. It's a great machine and I have been exploring the pulser. It does work nice at low pulse especially on thin SS. I even have used it on thin aluminum.....040 and .030. Makes a difference. the AC balance works nice too. It allows a smaller electrode for a given current if you have very clean and tight fitting joints. It a very stable machine and works right down to 5 amps and less. Equally at home on 250 amps on steel or aluminum.

The pulser works nice but after years of "fake pulsing" with the foot pedal it takes some getting used to. Being 70 yr old my timing and reactions as well as the steady hand have deteriated some. haha At higher rates it tends to lessen the total heat input but you have to move right along or there is no advantage. We have measured the heat transfer in moly tubing both with and without pulse so you can see the results. It's great for agitating the puddle too when necessary.

It take a huge amount of current out of the wall. We had to install a dedicated 100 amp service to get it to work at full power. I would not recommend one for a home hobbiest as getting 100 amp service might be tough to do considering the average home only has 200 amps total. Some are greater but not in the homes a few years old.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Penton Media, Inc. All rights reserved.