Yes I get what you're saying Shovelon. I do understand exactly what youre saying. Im doing my best to reduce that monkey wrench by pairing metals and other factors that work best. Travel speed and deposition rate are crucial for stable arc, yes. I appreciate your input. Im looking at many possible errors I could make.
Im on same page. There is a website which explains what most of are warning about such as flickering in the arc process, etc.. I had my brother learn from here and other Eaton Lincoln Miller/Hobart forums. Hobart forum is great. Miller app is ok but not the place to discuss hardware from HF.
https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/welding/determining-stability-of-the-arc-welding/96450
Weld Guru is another good site.
This site is actually my favorite.
Most importantly, I am not recording a test weld unless I have a stable arc, or as close to perfect one as i can get. Thats the most important, not to distance from other factors. Arc wandering, electrode resistances to oxidation or cleaned metal, etc. Know im not leaving stones unturned. E71T-11 Lincoln is the wire im using (very basic carbon steel that kinda sucks bit i can get it to work well) and im welding on carbon steel A307 (or 307A). Im also going to run some tests comparatively with Hobart wire as its better than the Lincoln stuff I have, although not by much. Each wire and metal almost match in strength and both are low/med carbon steels.
Its going to be as close to 100% as I can get. I know most drawbacks. Theres always a negligible amount of voltage lost at the arc but its less than other types of welding. Its within acceptable limit. Im not Tig welding or stick welding. Next theres fluctuating volts during welds (around 3 to 9 - loss or spikes) There are other current spikes too (10 to 20 volts). These you don't measure. You measure the average constant which levels out after a few seconds provided you're technique is acceptable.
I'm testing against my low and high with other mediums (tool steel A2) and wire as well (hobart fluxcore) to see how different if at all it could be. If the result is different ill find out. Staying away from H42 high strength stuff because the Titanium and wires used cannot deposit well on that type. Broccoli1's Lincoln could do that stuff for example or a miller/Hobart multiprocess but not this machine.
This isn't up for debate. There isn't any reason it can't get done or shouldn't be done either. If you like letters fine. I dont. I love welding and getting to know parameters from numbers. There is nothing wrong with wanting to put some numbers to this little machine. Its not curiosity. If it was I wouldn't record and reference it. Reference for what you say? By fine tuning via numbers you can then get used to AWS parameters. Current, length of arc, angle, manipulation and travel speed are one parameter. Another is knowing the amps volts and speed suggestions as per Lincoln or Miller welding parameters like their books show. Im not trying to impress or debate. Im trying to do something first and foremost for myself and came here to see if anyone did it yet. I found out there was no one so I'm doing it. Many want to know since. Naturally I want to tackle unforeseen isues. But im past that. Im trying to gets accurate readings with known metals. Putting numbers to the letters is not only possible it isn't going to be FAR OFF from true output. It always drops off true output so you start there and find your OCV and min/max current. Go by what you know and test around that so you know if your test is even worth a crap.
Wandering current isn't a serious issue. Ill be drawing direct from the wall. Other types of wandering arc won't be a issue either. Also I dont weld on humid days. 30-40% humidity max. I live in Texas. Humidity is like 60 to 90% everyday. Thats why the test is going slow. Wire speed and Volts can be adjusted a gazillion ways yes, im only aiming for A - J and the (.5) half marks between letters and im going to play with wire speed by parameter averages and fine tune it from there. Im not going outside the formula as you can tune wire speed and volts in infinite ways. The Titaniums guide on the machine is ALWAYS too low or too high on speed too. Its guide is flawed in my experience. It can be easy or very tricky if you guess and don't go by known parameters which outperform any ballpark the Titanium offers. However im trying to narrow down those variables to get some baseline data for the Titanium.
Louie1961 I didn't say the machine definitely "didn't" run that way. I said I "think" it may not run that way and that was someone else's wonder, not my concern. I just wasn't sure how chinese this thing was in regards to proprietary hardware. You are correct on operation.
Broccoli1, letters on machines suck is all im saying, Lincoln or a Miller. Everyone knows volt and amp readouts are superior. Im trying to make this machine better for myself. If it helps others, great. Im here to run a decent test. Ive spent nearly $120 on the best Ames meter they made. Ive already decided against the clamp meter side because T-RMS claim ive found isn't as accurate as they say. It adds another variable to current fluctuating losing more accuracy.
Direct test leads are the way to go. If you go back in my 1st post you'll know I'm looking for things to do proper not improper and because I want to know for myself. So do others, not just here but all over the internet.
Plenty of pro welders do this exact test with meters. In fact I'm doing this too because its already done by welders in the first place. From auto manufacturers to custom weld shops (on youtube to name one place) who advise this is how you test machines with letter readouts for better adaption to weld parameters.
Thank you for all the input. I do like the cons as much as the pros.