Reply to Thread

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Munkul

I agree with you about electric heating being as close to 100% efficient as possible. It's elementary.
However,
Heat pumps don't CREATE energy. They use energy to run a refrigeration loop which extracts lots of lower temperature heat from the ground, and compresses that energy into a smaller amount of higher temperature heat energy.
No energy is created or destroyed in this process. This energy comes from the GROUND. As you heat your small house, you're cooling the ground beneath you ever so slightly.

It's the same principle as your truck air conditioning. The refrigeration loop takes the heat out of your cabin air, and puts it back outside into an even hotter atmosphere. This process doesn't destroy energy!
So I'm not sure why you're trying to equate this with perpetual motion?

Now, current domestic heat pump installs are generally quoted as up to 4x "efficient". What this means is, for every KW of electricity used to run the pump, it will put 4KW of heat into the home.
Not sure where the "6X" came from, I wonder if the supplier was being a bit optimistic. 4X is pretty well accepted as the max with current tech, unless you have an exceptionally deep well into hot granite.
It is a good technology though, and it's growing larger every day, the heat pump industry over here is booming.

No energy is created or destroyed in any process, not even burning. If you knew how they can make hydrogen-based fuels from water, you would know it is just a loop. Nothing is ever created or destroyed. With refrigeration, if you are inputting, say, 1,000 watts, you can easily get out 4,000 watts, which is over unity. To say otherwise is a bit crazy.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Who needs guns when you can get space triangles.

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

No one's fightin that's why.

We had asked the Ukrainians to give up their nukes, and turn them over to Russia, and now they are being threatened with nukes by Putin. We had promised them if they did we would not allow them to be overrun by Russia.

Which brings us back to George Washington’s warning about dealing with other nations.

There can be no greater error than to
expect, or calculate, upon real favors from
nation to nation. It is an illusion which
experience must cure, which a just pride
ought to discard.” George Washington

Our founding fathers gave us the future if we wanted it, but apparently boobs and their overgrown egos must play out old history again and again.

You never give up your guns because as you say no one is fighting so why would you turn them in?

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

No one's fightin that's why.

Seems like you guys are fighting the politicians who are allowing the Chinese to bribe them and buy your land. I guess now whatever they allow is going to have to fly because you cannot fight them.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

No one's fightin that's why.

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

[emoji23]

Why did you guys give up your guns? Like the Germans?

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

[emoji23]

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

No. Go away.

i dont go anywhere for anything so weak, that cant face the music.
i titled it, "white sheep". hearing it might be enough to give u nightmares, if not cause u to piss ur panties at night

Re: Speed Of Light

No. Go away.

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by William McCormick

I enjoy a Wild Bill’s Root beer myself, best stuff around.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

been squeezing fresh pomagranite juice , the grey goose came out, add lil bubble up to it - very good. would u like to here a hippie song i rewrote about the current ongoing situation ?

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

You must be talking about the NY stuff

I enjoy a Wild Bill’s Root beer myself, best stuff around.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

You must be talking about the NY stuff

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

Glad to hear it.
A good robust beer and bbq diet keeps you young healthy and strong. Not like those soy boys.[emoji1783][emoji481]

The beer ends you up with Alzheimers and or liver problems. Too much barbecue has some shortcomings as well.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Glad to hear it.
A good robust beer and bbq diet keeps you young healthy and strong. Not like those soy boys.[emoji1783][emoji481]

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

Depends on how old you are. I heard you old codgers expend quite alot of energy trying to squeeze out a pea. Free energy equation not lookin so good now huh

No problem here with that yet, thank God. I still output a lot of work more than the average young fellow so I stay pretty fit for 60.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by William McCormick

You can create energy where you want it using less energy than the energy created where you want it.


I pee in the toilet it goes to the sewer treatment plant and out to sea, it evaporates and the cloud it forms fills the Niagara river up and generates the power for my house. Certainly it takes less energy to pea in the toilet, haha.

Depends on how old you are. I heard you old codgers expend quite alot of energy trying to squeeze out a pea. Free energy equation not lookin so good now huh

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

I once tried to create energy by drinking red bull. It made me hungry so I ate an apple, spitting out the seeds. My dog ate the seeds and pooped out in the back yard. Guess what, the poop grew into an apple tree. One day an apple fell down and hit me in the heed thereby proving you can't create energy even with unity and duality. So you're wrong again.

You can create energy where you want it using less energy than the energy created where you want it.


I pee in the toilet it goes to the sewer treatment plant and out to sea, it evaporates and the cloud it forms fills the Niagara river up and generates the power for my house. Certainly it takes less energy to pea in the toilet, haha.


Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

I once tried to create energy by drinking red bull. It made me hungry so I ate an apple, spitting out the seeds. My dog ate the seeds and pooped out in the back yard. Guess what, the poop grew into an apple tree. One day an apple fell down and hit me in the heed thereby proving you can't create energy even with unity and duality. So you're wrong again.

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

We're talking about energy here, not current, inductors or dodgy laws. Who is that bum Ohms anyway, bet he's woke.

If you have similar current and voltage created in a capacitor the same as the voltage and current used in the first half of the cycle to power something, the energy created for free is over unity. And of course we have over unity just look at heat pumps. That is all that is happening In a capacitor we are moving and storing power nothing is ever gained or lost in this universe.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by William McCormick

A resistive circuit limits the current drawn to ohms law. When a capacitor and restive element are in series with a power supply. An inductive load draws more current and usually higher voltage in an AC circuit.

We're talking about energy here, not current, inductors or dodgy laws. Who is that bum Ohms anyway, bet he's woke.

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Woznme

"Who told you that more energy is drawn through a resistive circuit"

It is true, just needs a coating of flux. (Magnetic)

A resistive circuit limits the current drawn to ohms law. When a capacitor and restive element are in series with a power supply. An inductive load draws more current and usually higher voltage in an AC circuit.

Sincerely,

William McCormick.

Re: Speed Of Light

"Who told you that more energy is drawn through a resistive circuit"

It is true, just needs a coating of flux. (Magnetic)

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Munkul

This thread has had me speechless over how truly dangerously ignorant William is.
However, his attacks on the currently accepted sciences is not a bad thing, as this alternative attitude is the reason why the current theories have been tested and proven as far as practicable.



This is the easiest "theory" of yours to disprove, so I'll jump straight in here.

The electrical energy from the battery charges both the capacitor to the same potential as the battery, and completes the circuit through the lightbulb, using energy and creating light.
Disconnect the battery, and the energy stored in the capacitor is discharged into the lightbulb, keeping it lit, until the potential becomes 0.

The only thing you have proved in this experiment is energy storage. You'd see a spike in current as the circuit is initially made, while the capacitor charges up. It has just pulled more energy from the battery than the lightbulb would have alone.

At NO POINT in this experiment is there anything even slightly approaching "free energy" or perpetual motion.
That's because it is an incorrect theory, it's literally impossible.

The first law of thermodynamics characterizes the impossibility of perpetual motion. This was theorised in the 18th century by various scientists and mathematicians who all came to the same conclusions independently. People have been trying to disprove it ever since, and at no point in 300 years has anyone came close.

Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula was such a radical breakthrough because it dealt with sub-atomic particle bonds which up until that point, no-one understood.

Since then, we have had no breakthoughs on this scale, although many have tried. Nanotech, superconductors, etc, nothing has given us the energy jump that we want and need. All just incremental advances in engineering.
All energy sources we have and use today are UTTERLY characterised by the two theories I have mentioned.

All we've had is the breakthrough in computing, which revolutionised the way we communicate and interact. But no quantum leap forward in energy terms.

Who told you that more energy is drawn through a resistive circuit if a capacitor is inline with it? That is just untrue. What I originally wrote is still exactly correct I have tested it thoroughly both monitoring with oscilloscope, and accurate milliamp prob. When you initialize the circuit the bulb draws full current as it would with or without the capacitor. As soon as the capacitor starts to charge the voltage drops. At that point you take the battery out of the circuit and connect the bulb to the capacitor and you will get the same lighting effect you did from the battery or better, but now from the capacitor that charged for free as does electric wiring in your house. A wire is a small capacitor.

If you cut the ground prong off your 100 foot extension cord and hold the grounded tool that it is powering you can feel the current nicely especially if your hands are wet. Even a ground fault breaker that the ground has come loose will cause this and it does not trip the breaker. I did a lot of wet coring in my day and I am sure of it.

With inductive loads an inline capacitor will raise voltage which can increase amperage, but not always not in all cases that is the art of sizing the capacitors right. Heat pumps move more watts of heat than they use to move them. That is over unity. An air conditioner is over unity but that would make them all look like communist government idiots. Fools say well heat pumps and air conditioners are taking the heat from somewhere, and I would say sure but they are delivering usable heat energy that once used will just migrate back to where it was taken. Following Newtons laws that nothing is ever gained or lost in our universe. Trust me people that understand electricity and the universe are hiding their laughing faces when people say there is no such thing as perpetual motion. Even people that work with electricity run for complex formula and rules rather than look at the reality. Let go of the peer pressure and understand it alone.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Munkul

This thread has had me speechless over how truly dangerously ignorant William is.
However, his attacks on the currently accepted sciences is not a bad thing, as this alternative attitude is the reason why the current theories have been tested and proven as far as practicable.



This is the easiest "theory" of yours to disprove, so I'll jump straight in here.

The electrical energy from the battery charges both the capacitor to the same potential as the battery, and completes the circuit through the lightbulb, using energy and creating light.
Disconnect the battery, and the energy stored in the capacitor is discharged into the lightbulb, keeping it lit, until the potential becomes 0.

The only thing you have proved in this experiment is energy storage. You'd see a spike in current as the circuit is initially made, while the capacitor charges up. It has just pulled more energy from the battery than the lightbulb would have alone.

At NO POINT in this experiment is there anything even slightly approaching "free energy" or perpetual motion.
That's because it is an incorrect theory, it's literally impossible.

The first law of thermodynamics characterizes the impossibility of perpetual motion. This was theorised in the 18th century by various scientists and mathematicians who all came to the same conclusions independently. People have been trying to disprove it ever since, and at no point in 300 years has anyone came close.

Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula was such a radical breakthrough because it dealt with sub-atomic particle bonds which up until that point, no-one understood.

Since then, we have had no breakthoughs on this scale, although many have tried. Nanotech, superconductors, etc, nothing has given us the energy jump that we want and need. All just incremental advances in engineering.
All energy sources we have and use today are UTTERLY characterised by the two theories I have mentioned.

All we've had is the breakthrough in computing, which revolutionised the way we communicate and interact. But no quantum leap forward in energy terms.

You are the kind of person that believes that liars are smart or slick. I think they are dumb. And although Biden admits that he is dumb for lying he is probably lying. You are worried about my intelligence while you probably voted in this fool? Or the fools in the other party (same party) that couldn’t use this against him? Get the balls to attack what is really evil, it is not me.



Sincerely,

William McCormick

Re: Speed Of Light

Originally Posted by Sberry

Just what is it that makes so many hate the government wholesale,,,, then they cheer the national anthem and all bent out of shape with people they dont feel are patriotic enough. I understand some people with a specific beef or even a bit of generalization but the simple mindedness of the politics is beyond me. I should say amazes and no wonder its so sucessful, we have boiled it all down to a political feeling could be simplified in about 7 questions the psycoligists poll.
I should have recorded a quote on the news in an interview with an idiot. They ask the guy,,, you know this isnt true. The guy said,,, yes but,,, I am going to believe it anyway.

Most of the citizens do not follow our basic doctrine because most have never seen it nor understand how it came to be. So they think America has laws made by men which is blasphemy actually. As only the laws of God his laws of science are true laws that cannot be broken. Politicians wanted the power of the Universal Scientist so they corrupted their work, their work of finding and explaining the true laws of science. And now we have mislabeled electricity, and perhaps 40 imaginary sub matter particles. If that is your idea of America yea I have no use for its leaders or you. America was over before George Washington left office, that is what most don’t realize. True Americans kept America alive in their hearts because it was stated to be “illegal" to live as in American publicly.

Sincerely,

William McCormick