+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: A nice little structual job I just finished.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marlborough, The Peoples Republik of MA
    Posts
    3,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Last edited by TozziWelding; 09-26-2006 at 12:01 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    52
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Did you weld them with 6010 or 6011?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In A Nice Comfy Chair
    Posts
    18,773
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    dont look so little to me...

    ...zap!


    I am not completely insane..
    Some parts are missing

    Professional Driver on a closed course....
    Do not attempt.

    Just because I'm a dumbass don't mean that you can be too.
    So DON'T try any of this **** l do at home.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    west-central IL
    Posts
    56
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Looks like good old 7018 to me

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marlborough, The Peoples Republik of MA
    Posts
    3,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    The web stiffeners in photo 2 were 6010, all the other joints were 6010 root with 7018 cover.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    MASS.
    Posts
    1,093
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    why would you run 6010 on anything structural:confused?:I have never seen or heard of something that is a structural being welded with 6010 at least not to aws code D1.1
    Last edited by admswelding; 09-26-2006 at 09:30 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    52
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    6010 for root gets you deep penetration. If you ever do bend tests it will always be done with 6010 root and 7018 cover

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Cal., Shasta County
    Posts
    9,327
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    What is it about the design of this house that needs those beams? Are they for the deck or for inner flooring or ceiling support?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Davenport, Iowa
    Posts
    1,533
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Looks like a 14"x 26# weighin what, maybe 350#? Whats the other one? 12"x? Howdja get em up there? Boom? Man power? Looked like fun!!! Nice deck view!!Hey, when you get paid, get an LN25---

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Escondido CA.
    Posts
    38
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Not to hijack post but when i did my bend test on 1" plate vertical up and overhead the root and covering passes was put in with 7018. It passed on both pieces. Kevin

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    MASS.
    Posts
    1,093
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Also when i did a bend test 3/8" coupon it was all done 7018 also.I still disagree 6010 has no place in structural welding.From what i know 6010 is a pipe welding rod.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    52
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    maybe things have been changed since I done it. But mine were done with 6010 root and 7018 cover.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    west-central IL
    Posts
    56
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    I have qualified welders with a 1/2" plate, 6010 root 7018 fill and cap with no back weld. I have also given a 1/2", 7018 all the way, back ground and back welded with 7018 both with successful bend tests. Just my .02. Henry

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marlborough, The Peoples Republik of MA
    Posts
    3,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    TEK, dead on on the beam sizes, we used a backhoe to get them from the truck to the deck, and then brute force and ignorance to get them in place. There is no roof decking going on top, nore another floor. The only reason steel is in this job is for a clear span betweeen rooms. The rafters from one roof are going to sit on the edge of the beam. As far as 6010 and 7018, there is absoloutly no code on residential steel in MA. The engineer only wrote "weld" in pencil on the prints with no specific WPS. As far as the web stiffeners they were an after thought and have minimal structual value. I am looking for an LN-25, or a Miller 12rc right now. And yes, when I took my D1.1test it was a 7018 backing bead ground out, and all 7018 in the groove. Once again this is not a bridge or a battleship just a single family house that didnt want a huge wall.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NE Pa.
    Posts
    6
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    Certified in structural open root,6010 root,6010 hot,7018cover.I would like to see you close up open root with 7018 with out any slag inclusion

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    B.C. Canada
    Posts
    2,762
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A nice little structual job I just finished.

    I find it typical of engineers drawing the minimal amount of instruction. I just assembled a frame that called for half inch fillets on 3/8 inch material. They are often guessing themselves.
    Low hydrogen is used on structural to avoid the possibility of underbead cracking. Using cellulose rod in the root is not normal practice however a cover pass with low hydrogen plus the action of reheating the bead underneath will eliminate the possibility of hydrogen entrapment.
    The addition of the stiffeners is smart. It should have been on the original print.
    At least you didn't have to do this job in the show or rain :'))

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

A) Welding/Fabrication Shop
B) Plant/Production Line
C) Infrastructure/Construction/Repair or Maintenance/Field Work
D) Distributor of Welding Supplies or Gases
E) College/School/University
F) Work Out of Home

A) Corporate Executive/Management
B) Operations Management
C) Engineering Management
D) Educator/Student
E) Retired
F) Hobbyist

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,713,255,116.76411 seconds with 20 queries