So all those options out there on the market, and the general consensus is they are the same, pick one to have it all the same on your welders. But, are they really all the same?...
Heres the real question: if voltage/ amps loss is relative to cable diameter, then in theory you want the cable connectors to have as much "mating surface contact" as possible. Or to look at in the other way, if a connector has only a few points of contact, then it is equivalent to a thinner diameter cable. Is that logic correct?
If it is, then one could simply measure the resistance between connections on those different types/ brands of connectors and the factual data would settle the debate once and for all.... The ones with the least resistance wins.
Am I correct or is the logic incorrect because the "travel length through connector" is very short, and therefore it adds very little resistance / heat at the connection and does not contribute to voltage loss like a thinner cable?
Heres the real question: if voltage/ amps loss is relative to cable diameter, then in theory you want the cable connectors to have as much "mating surface contact" as possible. Or to look at in the other way, if a connector has only a few points of contact, then it is equivalent to a thinner diameter cable. Is that logic correct?
If it is, then one could simply measure the resistance between connections on those different types/ brands of connectors and the factual data would settle the debate once and for all.... The ones with the least resistance wins.
Am I correct or is the logic incorrect because the "travel length through connector" is very short, and therefore it adds very little resistance / heat at the connection and does not contribute to voltage loss like a thinner cable?